In researching topics for this blog, or just when I tell people that I my practice is focused on representing homeowners associations I often here some variation of “why would anyone live under those rules.
In researching topics for this blog, or just when I tell people that my practice is focused on representing homeowners associations, I often hear some variation of “why would anyone live under those rules”. Today’s Orlando Sentinel answers the same question. Aside from the fact that in today’s market you often cannot avoid living in a homeowners association, the best reason to live in an HOA is that they protect property values by maintaining the look and aesthetics of a community. Enforcement of CC&Rs can help when your neighbors don’t mow their lawn or let it go brown in front of their home. In addition, homeowners associations often provide social areas such as swimming pools, tennis courts and a clubhouse for socials, and are an effective alternative to calling city code enforcement when your neighbor parks his car on his front lawn. What positive experiences have you had living in an HOA?
Nevada bill AB 361 may soon provide Homeowners Associations in Nevada the right to maintain the yards of foreclosed homes within their communities without fear of being liable for trespass.
Pending Nevada bill AB 361 may soon provide Homeowners Associations in Nevada the right to maintain the yards of foreclosed homes within their communities without fear of being liable for trespass. The Nevada State Assembly Judiciary Subcommittee heard testimony on the bill this week before referring the bill back to the full committee for consideration at a later date.
As the foreclosure crisis has spread, unoccupied, untended homes have been a growing concern for community associations for reasons of health, safety and property values. But the associations have been unable to do anything because tending to the bank-owned properties would technically be trespassing. The proposed bill would require a lender that forecloses on a residence within a homeowners association to notify the association and provide it with the lender’s contact information. The association would then be able to enter the property for the purpose of maintaining the grounds, the exterior and abating public nuisances. Any expenses the association incurs would be filed as a lien against the property, which would have to be paid when sold.
While this option would allow associations to recover some of the costs they will incur, it also opens up a myriad of issues such as whether the association would face any liability if it knows of squatters, or any dangerous condition on the property. It also would create a special class of property owner.
When a bank takes title to a property through foreclosure, just like any other property owner, it is subject to the CC&Rs, including any maintenance requirements. All other property owners in an association are required to maintain the property themselves, and do not have the option of allowing the association to take up the maintenance. Allowing banks to fail to undertake their maintenance obligation is simply another type of bank bailout. The association will have to front the maintenance expenses and will only recover those costs when the home is sold. Since the association would not have any control over when the property is sold, it could potentially be faced with fronting the cost to maintain a property for months or even years. As a result, the association (and by extension the other property owners) are faced with the expense of maintaining bank owned property, while the bank incurs no expense until the property is sold.
While creating a mechanism to allow HOAs to enter onto the land and maintain a bank owned home may seem like a good idea, it places a burden on the association and other homeowners, and creates a special class of property owner. If an association is going to be allowed to enter onto the unkept property owned by a bank, it should be able to enter onto and maintain all unkept property, not simply foreclosed homes.
Hopefully, the bill will be amended to extend an associations’ ability to maintain any property where the owner is not meeting their maintenance obligations, not simply bank owned property. Further, the association should continue to access the propety owner, and the bill should allow the association to assess a fine which would “encourage” banks and other property owners to undertake their maintenance responsibilities rather than relying on the association to take over those obligations.